Skip to main content

Compare provider performance

Draft — 2026-09-26

Drafted from the screen's code on main (kareIntelligence 7455702). Not yet reviewed against a live session. Roles listed are the defaults the app's role matrix (@collabkare/ability 0.12.0) gives this screen's route; your organization's role overrides can change them. In the sectioned analytics menu, Provider Performance is listed for Program Administrator only.

Network → Provider Performance gives one scorecard row per attributed PCP panel, joining five analytics domains: panel share, ER use, readmissions, wellness-visit compliance and risk capture.

What you see​

  • Summary — attributed patients, PCP panels in view and how many of the five scorecard domains answered ("Scorecard domains live n/5").
  • Provider scorecards — per panel: patients and share of network, ER visits and avoidable ER share, index admissions with 30- and 90-day readmissions, MWV eligible and compliance, current RAF and open gaps. A filtered network blend row shows only the network values the engine serves (today the 90-day readmission rate); its other columns stay dashed.
  • Quality vs risk by PCP panel — MWV compliance against average current RAF, with bubble size for attributed patients. High-RAF, low-compliance panels (upper left) are the priority.
  • MWV compliance distribution — panels per compliance band.
  • Top & bottom performers — the top three panels per metric (best and lowest MWV compliance, lowest and highest avoidable ER share).

Choose the Payment year for the RAF columns at the top.

Honest states​

  • An em dash means that domain served no value for the panel; nothing is imputed.
  • If a domain fails, its columns show em dashes and its rankings say, for example, "Compliance rankings unavailable — wellness domain down."
  • No composite score is computed: without a registry entry for one, there is no number.
  • Providers appear as PCP IDs; kareIntelligence has no provider directory.